Apple’s anticipated entry to the wearable devices market has taken on near-mythical status, with rumors reaching every corner of the technology map. AppleInsider has rounded up some of the technologies most likely to find their way into the still-unannounced “iWatch.”
Apple’s interest: A $578 million deal with sapphire equipment maker GT Advanced Technologies to open and operate a massive commercial sapphire plant in Arizona.
Much has been made of Apple’s agreement GT Advanced Technologies. Many believe the new jointly-operated facility in Arizona will produce display covers to replace the Gorilla Glass currently used in the iPhone and iPad; some think the crystals will be used in an iWatch, while still others believe that Apple simply needs more sapphire for its camera lenses and Touch ID housings.
If sapphire is to be used as a main component of an Apple device, the iWatch is its most likely target. High-end watch companies have long used sapphire to cover the faces of their timepieces because of its scratch resistance, but — as anyone who has dropped a sapphire-covered watch can attest — the material is prone to shattering, making it far better suited for a device that’s constantly strapped to a person rather than hanging loosely in their hands.
Apple’s interest: A $20 million contract for exclusive rights to use Liquidmetal in consumer electronics and a number of manufacturing patents related to the material. That agreement was re-upped through February 2015 earlier this week.
Liquidmetal is an amorphous alloy — essentially, metallic glass — that is much lighter, harder, and more flexible than metals traditionally used in electronics manufacturing. Parts made of Liquidmetal could “snap back” from deformations that might cause permanent bends or dents in other metals, such as Apple’s omnipresent aluminum, and it’s extremely scratch-resistant.
Liquidmetal is difficult to work with, however. Apple famously tested its viability by using it to make the SIM ejector tool included with the iPhone 3GS, but Liquidmetal’s inventor predicted in 2012 that at least two to four years of further refinement in manufacturing processes was necessary before it could be commercially viable on a large scale.
Complicating Liquidmetal’s possible appearance in Apple’s iWatch is a deal with Switzerland’s Swatch group that granted the horologists exclusive use of Liquidmetal in watches.
Apple’s interest: Apple has a number of OLED-related patents to its name, including dynamic brightness adjustment and improved power efficiency. The company also hired away a senior OLED researcher from LG Display.
OLED — or organic light-emitting diode — displays are a new type of display in which each pixel is made of an organic compound that emits light when electrical current is passed through it. Because of this design, OLED panels don’t require a backlight, making them thinner and lighter than traditional LCD-based panels and adding the potential to be folded or curved.
While many Apple watchers previously expected the iWatch to ship with a more traditional LCD panel, the tide of opinion has shifted in recent months in favor of OLED. The inclusion of a flexible OLED would allow for a more form-fitting design in which the screen could curve with the contours of the wearer’s wrist, rather than sitting flat on the top.
From the outside, Apple has long seemed apathetic toward OLEDs. Former CEO Steve Jobs is thought to have disliked the technology, and current chief Tim Cook panned OLED earlier this year, saying that the displays showed “awful” color saturation.
“If you ever buy anything online and really want to know what he color is, as many people do, you should really think twice before you depend on the color from an OLED display,” he said.
A similar micro LED array displayed by Taiwanese researchers
Apple’s interest: Acquired micro-LED display maker LuxVue Technologies earlier this month for an unknown price.
Micro LEDs are essentially exactly what they sound like: very small LEDs. The technology that enables their miniaturization also plays a part in lowering power consumption and increasing brightness, with the combination placing micro LED arrays in direct competition with OLEDs.
This is a relatively new technology, however; Apple’s acquisition of secretive LuxVue is likely to have given micro LEDs more exposure the day it was uncovered than the technology has received since its invention. Despite a number of high-profile backers — and their rumored inclusion in Google’s next-generation Glass headset — micro LEDs have yet to find their way into shipping consumer device.
Still, there is reason to believe that Apple may have chosen the micro LED route. At least one of LuxVue’s patents covers the manufacturing of a curved micro LED array, which could replace the flexible AMOLED display Apple is thought to have targeted.
The article above is a repost from Abney and Associates.